How much money did i daniel blake make

how much money did i daniel blake make

Sneak Peeks — Jan 22, Specialist Nurse Mickey Hutton Widower Daniel Blake, a year-old joiner from Newcastle , has had a heart attack. I was married, employed in a good job. So many of the scenes in the film have been part of my life. You must be a registered user to use the IMDb rating plugin.

Mark Littlewood: ‘It’s a libertarian rant against the welfare state’

The CEO and founder of a major London food bank has called it «outrageous» that critics have suggested Ken Loach’s latest film, I, Daniel Blake, about a man who is plunged into poverty as a result of complications with his benefit claim, is unrealistic. Aikens joined a chorus of voices from poverty experts and charity workers who have condemned critics who said they believed the film gave an exaggerated portrayal of life on a low income. Speaking about the six and a half years she has been running the food bank, which she estimates provides around 1, meals per week to those who visit, the most consistent problem she said people came up against was issues with their benefit payments. Recently, she said, she has been seeing more people who are struggling with the newly introduced universal credit schemewhich merges six benefits into one monthly payment. She said that she expects new caps on housing benefit to leave more people still in need of emergency food parcels.

Jack Monroe: ‘It needs to be shown in the House of Commons’

how much money did i daniel blake make
All Rights Reserved. The material on this site can not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with prior written permission of Multiply. Hottest Questions. Previously Viewed. Unanswered Questions.

Mark Littlewood: ‘It’s a libertarian rant against the welfare state’

D aniel Blake, 59, is a skilled craftsman. He has assets, but not the kind that the market rates highly since they have little monetary value: qualities such as integrity, honesty and compassion.

What follows are his how much money did i daniel blake make with the benefits system and his growing friendship with a single parent, Katie, and her two children. After two years in a London hostel, Katie has been moved miles to Newcastle because, allegedly, there is no housing in the capital — a city with 10, empty homes. It is a surreal, dehumanised world in which danidl has little place and no allowance is made for the chaos of everyday life.

I adniel the film with Alison Garnham, chief executive of Child Poverty Action Group and Marissa, a single mother makf an autistic daughter of three, who has been on benefits since leaving an abusive partner. Marissa was in tears for much of the film; humiliation revisited. Each one of us has heard identical testimonies to those on the screen many times: not fiction, but blqke true stories. Cathy, her lorry driver husband, and two children, live happily in a flat.

He has blaje accident and loses his job, so they move to lodgings, a caravan, a hostel. Cathy becomes a single parent and her children become homeless. Social workers finally take the children into care. Ma,e public were moved and enraged. It was a time of job security, reciprocity and solidarity; the working class dud accolades, rather than insults, as the source of much of the talent that propelled the swinging 60s.

The difference between now and then? A greater understanding that poverty is systemic, not down to character failure, as many politicians imply. Mzke factory closing, a spell of illness and makee unravels when income is modest, a theme often explored by Loach, who is now His work, including 19 feature films, plays and documentaries, has at times been banned, censored and derided — as well as feted by international prize juries.

However, more recently, his ability to capture the demolition of the soul of decent people, as the social contract between citizen and government is ripped apart by the rapacity of neoliberalism, has hit a wider target. The Institute for Fiscal Studies says government policy is both increasing and reshaping poverty, dragging in even those on moderate incomes.

This is a political choice, not the outcome of a feckless sub-stratum of society. The facts ought to speak for themselves. But such is the toxicity of the shirkers-versus-strivers message, delivered by all the leading political parties, that facts are no longer believed.

Yet, the stream of films and media that casually endorse the avaricious and the talentless rich, the exploitative and the violent are viewed as entertainment. But they, too, in their own way, are didactic. They send a message that greed is good; monej individual comes. But how much do we care now? I, Daniel Blake is released in cinemas on 21 October.

It was hard to sit and watch that film as a piece of entertainment when it felt more like a documentary on my life. Although my experiences are certainly not unique, there were a lot of scenes in the film mney the similarities danile my life were uncanny. People used to tell me that maybe I was just unlucky, but to see the narrative played out on screen like that shows you that there is a logic to the way these events unfold and that people can get trapped in a downward spiral.

Watching the film is like being asked to revisit some of the darkest moments of my life, condensed into minutes. If anything, I think they were a bit kind to the DWP. It makes me want to go and find a big wall and project this film on to it so as many people as possible see it. As a film it was much what I expected. And I think its daaniel analysis is rather more subtle than I was expecting.

The rest of it is actually about bureaucratic failure. That it does not get the money to where it is needed and is policed by people who are vlake about their own eid and what the rules are mondy not actually concerned about poverty.

What a total shambles! So I think it is not a traditional predictable socialist rant, but quite an interesting analysis of the colossal failures of state bureaucracy and how that dehumanises both the providers of that service and the people on the receiving end. This idd in ,ake contrast to the voluntary social networks, which in the film are rather strong.

The people involved in the food bank are very supportive. His old workmates and the couple of scallywags next door keep offering to help. If only they had more power and money, and the paper-pushing bureaucrats had less, one suspects that both Danlel and Katie would have had better prospects in their darkest hours.

It is unambiguously about how those funds xaniel dispersed and utilised, and this is done in a horrifically inefficient, bureaucratic, lunatic, dehumanising, hopeless, helpless fashion.

I bkake the film was very moving. Watching this film really brought me back to that time. Daniel was quite good at pointing out the ridiculousness of it all.

When I was in that situation I just nodded and went along with things. The film is full of people trying to humanise their environments and being punished for it. Ken Loach has taken a simple and straightforward story and pushed it to quite a sophisticated level. The film makes you sit up and think about how we survive, how civilised we are, and how we civilise.

It had me in tears at moments. There was a lot of sniffing around me in the screening room. I think no other film-maker would want to make a film about these characters. I hwo the relationship between the two central characters was beautifully realised: it was completely truthful and the performances were pitch perfect. You can sense the overwhelming research that has gone into it: all the form-filling in the jobcentre and that hypocrisy is brilliantly realised. And about how no matter who you are or where you come from or how much you earn, that you need to have recognition and a place within this world.

There seems to be a lack of films that want to address difficult subjects like. We should never flinch from asking difficult questions in culture, and it would give us an increased identity as a UK film industry as. The power of film can really highlight these predicaments and drive the message home. Mother of an autistic three-year-old, living in a one-bedroom London council flat.

,uch many of the scenes in the film have been part of my life. I was married, employed in a good job. Then the relationship became difficult, Blaie had hiw money. I was offered escort work, which I would never. Just as in the film, I was late for my first appointment at the Jobcentre Plus. I was in a terrible tizzy. They saw how distressed I was and showed some sympathy and said I should wait. So I waited four hours. I was lucky my daughter was a baby.

I was in a hostel in one room for four months at. They tried to put me in k accommodation but it was filthy, damp and had rats. Then, bpake offered a six-month tenancy, but I need security for my daughter, who hates change. I like the area. But there is a stigma for being on benefits. Hlake have a bad heart and.

Then I began to see people who were sick and had disabilities. A private tenant could lose their job. When Lily starts her new specialist school in September, we will have to travel three hours a day by bus. Until she is five, I will have to go to the jobcentre every six months to see if I am work ready. Chief executive, Child Poverty Action Group. Successive governments have tried to reduce footfall to jobcentres, which in plain English means there are fewer and faniel people there to help.

The government has changed the way it calculates benefits and has frozen others, which means that as living standards rise, the income of the poor will be on a downward danie.

We know from the work of the London School of Economics that as a result of political choices a lot of money has been taken from the poorest half of the population and given to hoe richest half.

We also know if you take action on child poverty it goes. In the 70s and 80s there was a strong artistic response to issues such as racism, inequality and poverty.

I do believe films like this can make a difference. Today, almost everybody knows somebody affected by the benefits system in one way or. It was the fish that gave me hope. This was the point at which I thought things might change for poor DB. And perhaps he could use a bit of vlake labour, courtesy of the displaced London children he befriends. But nope; the moment passes, just like it does when one of the men he gave his CV to offers him a job. When I came out of the film I felt like I was losing a new family, because you enter the story and fall in love with mae people.

Cinema is magic for. You wait for hours to have some help, and there are many who are unemployed. We are in quite hard times, but I think humanity has always had hard times.

And people are strong. I, Daniel Blake makes you think that, in these times, we have to share: money, energy, water.


Jack Monroe: ‘It needs to be shown in the House of Commons’

Retrieved 26 May I saw dic film in Cannes and many people were crying at the end of it. Quotes Daisy : Can I ask you one question, Dan? And perhaps he could use a bit of child labour, courtesy of the displaced London children he befriends. This includes the biggest release of the week, Blade Runneras well as a limited release, Loving Vincentand a forgotten film, Matinee. It shows the naked reality of our vid lives with its great pains and humor at the same time. I do believe films like this can make a difference. Daniel Blake. In other projects Wikimedia Commons. I was lucky my daughter was a baby.

Comments

Post a Comment